NHS whistleblower: Millions of euthanasia drugs were covertly ordered by the government before the pandemic

According to a top NHS whistleblower, the British government ordered millions of euthanasia pills months before the COVID epidemic was made public.

According to a top NHS whistleblower, the British government ordered millions of euthanasia pills months before the COVID epidemic was made public

Graham Atkinson is a pharmacist who has worked at the local, regional, and national levels over his more than thirty years of senior NHS management experience.

He has held positions as a partner in a general practitioner's practice, a director of commissioning in multiple Primary Care Trusts in the North West, a consultant for Big Pharma, and an employee of NHS national teams.

In October 2021, his prosperous career in the NHS abruptly ended when he made the decision to no longer take part in the government's covert euthanasia program.

According to Expose-news.com, a few weeks ago, he had an almost three-hour conversation with Doc Malik about the NHS, his experiences during the COVID era, his decision to leave the NHS in order to create a better healthcare model that will render the current one obsolete, and other topics.

The video has been embedded twice.

First, let's start at the time Atkinson discussed the "just-in-case" medications. Second, when he mentioned therapies that ought to have been used but weren't, at the timing. An uncensored transcript of the conversation is available HERE.

Just before the first lockdown in early March 2020, directives were released to put "just-in-case" medications in place based on the assumption that there will be COVID outbreaks in numerous care facilities, Atkinson told Doc Malik. The "just in case drugs" include midazolam, morphine, and other sedatives.

"A number of national changes were made in early March, including adjustments to the NICE guidelines, the rules governing cremation, and death certification," he stated.

According to Atkinson, the NICE NG163 guideline was the main alteration. But since then, things have changed.

The original guidelines are no longer in place. This is the protocol for individuals with COVID-19 to enable them to pass away more peacefully—a good death.

Encouraging non-departmental public policy, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence ("NICE") is supported by the UK Department of Health and Social Care ("DHSC"). It is an organization under the National Health Service ("NHS") that creates guidelines and recommendations about the efficacy of medical procedures and treatments.

On October 13, 2020, NG163 was upgraded and replaced by NG161. NG163 is available for viewing via the Wayback Machine HERE.

What are the effects on a person of "just-in-case" drugs?

It causes you to breathe less. Before it makes you unconscious, there are medications to lessen your anxiety, according to Atkinson.

It causes you to breathe less. Before it makes you unconscious, there are medications to lessen your anxiety, according to Atkinson.

"The 'just-in-case' medications are a group of five widely utilized pharmaceuticals. These have been used for many years to help cancer patients or even those suffering from COPD, a respiratory condition that causes breathing difficulties and extreme anguish in the latter stages of life. Therefore, there are medications to lessen their anxiety over being unable to breathe, medications to ease their discomfort, medications to help them relax, and midazolam, as we all know, induces unconsciousness," he said.

When these pills are administered to a resident of a nursing home who has dementia or a cold or flu, Atkinson stated, "It's going to progress you rapidly towards your final days because [your final days are] expected."

According to Atkinson, the story at the time was that COVID was a new illness for which there were no medications.

"Clinicians were told at the time that this is a new, unusual condition, but we now know that all of this is untrue. We don't have any effective medications. You can only provide these people with the appropriate treatment, which is to ease their passage. because this was the period when people all throughout the world were fast dying and being placed on ventilators. We were all watching it on TV, you know," he remarked.

"What actually happened in my area was that the care home manager called and said, 'Mary Smith's got a cough and she's looking not her normal self.' This was pre-PCR testing, and the residents in the care homes were diagnosed based on the only evidence available." The doctor on the phone then replies, "Probably covid, send the just-in-case drugs," keeping in mind that at the time we were all working remotely.

Atkinson declared, "We killed people."

"I observed while this was taking place. As I previously stated, I anticipated 500 deaths in the first wave [based on the storyline]. In actuality, though, nobody perished. Our respective mortality rates were the same. In reality, there were many outbreaks in our care facilities, and we anticipated that they would spread quickly and lead to a large number of caskets being removed, but that wasn't the case.

The care home epidemics, thus, were unsuccessful. It was a burger of nothing. I saw individuals in their 70s, 80s, and 90s who were hospitalized to my hospital's pulmonary COVID unit and were fully released a week later. I smelled a huge rat two or three days before the initial lockdown, Atkinson said. Atkinson realized then that the administration had been lying to us.

For Atkinson, it all came down to Matt Hancock's denial in the House of Commons that there was any connection between vitamin D and COVID survival.

Atkinson stated, "He stated in the House of Commons that there was no link in the research the government had commissioned into vitamin D effectiveness in covid." "He misled Parliament, so the following day he had to go back and make a statement to Parliament and correct Hansard."

"We've not conducted any study. Since there is no data, as we all know, there is no proof that something doesn't exist.

Clinically speaking, as we all know, blood levels of vitamin D determine whether or not you treat someone. However, the level of vitamin D in your blood before you become ill is crucial to your survival during any illness you may have, but especially during a respiratory illness, the speaker continued.

Atkinson cited a research conducted in Spain that measured the blood levels of vitamin D in patients awaiting admission to a hospital's COVID unit.

“I think the NHS is happy with 50; if your level’s 50 in your blood, happy days, it’s enough – [although] it’s not really enough – but 75, 100, 150 is better. But the [study] said that anybody who had a blood level over 80, I think it was 75 actually, over 75 they had an 80% chance of living. If their blood level was below 75, they had an 80% chance of dying. And I knew then that the treatments that would work for whatever covid was, but treatments that were evidence-based, were simple and cheap, were being systematically withheld and repressed from patients,” he said.

“And any clinician who dared speak those words, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, vitamin D, vitamin C, intravenous vitamin C – the Chinese were using it, we knew the Chinese were using it in March/April 2020 – I approached my local hospital, ‘maybe we should try this’. Absolutely not. Because to put your head above that parapet as a clinician meant blackballing. You were gonna be seriously taken out.

“If [a doctor] started prescribing ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, intravenous vitamin C, you’d find somebody’s heavy hand on your shoulder very quickly.

“Why? Because if you’re going to subsequently give the emergency use authorisation for, and I hesitate to call it a vaccine, but let’s say you have an intervention that you need to bypass the normal regulatory approval and you need so it has to go through emergency use authorisation.

“So, we’ve got a novel disease – it was declared a novel disease – we have nothing that works, according to the government, and so therefore, because those two criteria are met, legally we can emergency use authorise this jab. And it’s still to this day emergency use authorised. They haven’t gone back and done it properly.”